logomenu

Fully compliant with the BEVM(λ) paradigm,providing a new paradigm for blockchain technology innovation.

The Problem & Background: The Lost Crypto Narrative
In 2015, Ethereum highlighted three core issues—Bitcoin script's "lack of Turing completeness," the inefficiency of PoW, and limited TPS for large-scale applications. These shaped the entire blockchain industry's direction.
Are Ethereum's three major problems really problems?
lack of Turing completeness ?
Turing Incompleteness: Ethereum introduced a fully Turing-complete EVM with global state, undermining the decentralized foundation of UTXO-based design.
Inefficiency of PoW ?
Consensus Efficiency: While PoS reduces energy consumption, it severs external energy input, leaving the system in a closed, entropy-increasing loop.
limited TPS ?
Network Scalability: Bitcoin's lower TPS is a superficial limitation. Its true strength lies in PoW, the UTXO model, and the robust mapping between hash power and coin value.
These fundamental issues indicate that the technological improvements of the Ethereum era have actually deviated from the core design principles of Crypto commerce, namely, distributed closed-loop commerce based on energy conservation, decentralization of the Individual, and emergent consensus mechanisms. The cognitive deviation of Ethereum not only fails to address the original problems but also leads to deeper systemic challenges.

Our Solution Overview

The BEVM(λ) Paradigm

A Two-Tier Architecture—Mother & Sub Consensus
By deeply analyzing Bitcoin's design,Agere Consensus introduces the BEVM(λ) paradigm with four key components, maintaining Bitcoin's security while providing a scalable and sustainable framework for future smart cryptocurrencies.

.01

Individual Model
Bitcoin's UTXO-based Coins are independent value units, ensuring true individual sovereignty without relying on a global state.

.02

λ-Calculus
Bitcoin transactions form a λ-calculus system where f(compute) = TX(Input(Individual), Output(Individual)), enabling stateless and independent distributed computation.

.03

Consensus Algorithm
The functionf(consensus) = Consensus(hash, difficulty) addresses the Byzantine Fault Tolerance problem. Bitcoin’s consensus algorithm quantifies hash computation, using the nonce as an individual unit to achieve emergent distributed consensus computing, reflecting genuine decentralization.

.04

Consensus Sensing Algorithm
f(Consensus, Energy Input, Conversion)= Value Output.This function achieves a distributed commercial system that adheres to the law of conservation of energy by integrating the transaction function and the consensus function.
Dual-Layer Consensus: Linking the Past, Embracing the Future

A Two-Tier Architecture—Mother & Sub Consensus

Dual Token Staking Model

Non-custodial staking of Bitcoin

Time Pledge and Energy Conservation

Dual-token coordination mechanism

Randomness and Threshold Mechanism

Bitcoin Staking & Dual-Token Model

Nodes can stake BTC (non-custodially via Lightning Network) to earn BEVM tokens based on time and quantity;

Preserves the PoW-based security and external energy anchoring from Bitcoin.

BFT PoS Algorithm

Uses Substrate’s Aura+GRANDPA to produce blocks swiftly and finalize them with Byzantine fault tolerance;

While reducing PoW’s direct energy demands, it maintains a link to external energy input via the staked BTC.

Mother Consensus

Inherits Bitcoin’s core design, featuring decentralization and energy conservation.

Agere Consensus

BEVM Production Mechanism Based on Agent Workload

Compromise Quantification Scheme for Subjective Scoring

Core Philosophy:

Quantify multi-Agent workloads and collaborative contributions to foster true emergent intelligence.

Subjective Rating + Stake :

Combines objective workload metrics with subjective scoring to address diverse, complex tasks.

Layered Allocation:

Distributes resources across systems (inter-system) and within each system (intra-system) to ensure fairness and autonomy.

Value Mapping:

Agents perform real tasks and receive BEVM tokens in return, forming a closed energy-conservation loop.

Sub-consensus

Is centered around Agere consensus, exploring new models of distributed economy by strictly adhering to the BEVM(R) paradigm.

The Journey of BEVM

BTC Layer2 Exploration
To boost Bitcoin's throughput, Layer2 solutions aimed to enhance off-chain capacity but saw limited adoption, failing to impact broader usage.
Taproot Consensus
Combining Bitcoin SPV state channels with Taproot aimed to enable decentralized custody and expand smart contracts. However, with BTC already mainstream in exchanges and mining pools, improving its consensus mechanism was more crucial than enhancing its currency features.
SuperBitcoin
This stage introduced a crypto system leveraging Bitcoin's security, but it failed to address the "dreamworld disconnection" of Ethereum-like virtual machines, which operate solely within internal liquidity and lack real-world data integration.
BitAgere
BitAgere, drawing parallels between Bitcoin's "mechanical consensus" and AI agents' cognition, aimed to bridge perception gaps by integrating AI sensing on-chain, enhancing real-world awareness and Crypto-AI synergy.
BEVM(λ) Paradigm
BEVM(λ), built on Bitcoin's design, distills four pillars—Individual model, λ-calculus, consensus algorithm, and consensus-aware algorithm—while preserving energy conservation and decentralization. With the Agere subsystem, it boosts autonomy and intelligence via stateless computing and refined consensus.

Please contact us through the following social media platforms. We welcome inquiries from developers, loyal users, or investors.

Copyright © BEVM